NewsTrust.net

February 1st, 2008

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

By Alexandre Gamela

 

What do they say it is?

NewsTrust.net helps people find good journalism online.

Our non-profit, non-partisan project provides quality news feeds, news literacy tools and a trust network to help citizens make informed decisions about democracy.

The free NewsTrust.net website features daily feeds of quality news and opinions, which are carefully rated by our members, using our unique review tools. We rate the news based on quality, not just popularity. NewsTrust reviewers evaluate each article against core journalistic principles such as fairness, evidence, sourcing and context.”

What do I say it is?

It is a social news website. NewsTrust gathers news feeds that are evaluated and ranked by its users, to establish the credibility of those sources. It features blogs, magazines, tvs, radios, all of them scrutinized by regular readers, that assess if Is this good journalism?”

A sort of Michelin guide for news media.

What’s great about it?

Users get the chance to review their news sources, and compare their quality. They input their analysis through a very complete form: it includes rating parameters like trust, fairness, sources and context; there’s also a space to cross reference the news stories with other sources, and users can even leave their suggestions to improve articles, as long they support their ideas with facts.

One of their goals is to fight civic apathy, and making people question what they are being fed to is a good way to do that. The moral principles of NewsTrust are high, and they present themselves as a part of the solution for resolving media/users trust issues.

People in charge of NewsTrust are experienced, reputable professionals, which gives extra credibility to the project.

What could be better?

Not much, but it’s very USA oriented, and that may not be even a downside. It’s still a beta version, though bugs were not found. It all seems transparent and rather simple, really.

How is it going to make money?

In their own words: “Founded in 2005 and based in Mill Valley, California, NewsTrust is a non-profit, non-partisan project funded through grants and private donations and sponsored by The Global Center, an educational foundation based in Manhattan. So far, we have received support from foundations such as the Sunshine Foundation, Ayrshire, Mitch Kapor and Tides Foundations, as well as private donors such as Craig Newmark (Craigslist) and Doug Carlston (Public Radio International). We’re also discussing multi-year funding with several major foundations - as well as partnerships with national news providers. Though we are nonprofit and initially funded through donations, we plan to run the venture as a sustainable business, and to generate revenue in the online market to support this project. Revenue streams include advertising, memberships, licensing and ecommerce.”

Should I pay it any attention?

NewsTrust is a solid project that works both ways: users challenge the quality of journalism being made, and news companies and journalists have a reference to improve and become more trustworthy. It asks both for better readers and better news.

Sphere: Related Content

Entry Filed under: Non-profit

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Review: NewsTrust.net &la&hellip  |  February 1st, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    […] post info By Alexandre Gamela Categories: Corrente | Current e JournalismEnterprise Tags: alexandre gamela, journalism, journalism enterprise, newstrust.net, non-profit, review Mais uma crítica JE | Another JE review […]

  • 2. NicolasKayserBril  |  February 2nd, 2008 at 8:20 am

    Hey Alex, as promised, my 2€cts on NewsTrust ;)

    What’s the point of NewsTrust if the sources that get most praise are the ones struggling to be trusted by the general public? On the frontpage I looked at, 80% of the featured stories came from the most mainstream of MSM (NyTimes, AP…). Is NewsTrust to become yet another self-justificatory institution of the liberal left?

    From a technical/design pov, I found the site very disconcerting and it took me about 2 minutes to understand what to look at, even though I knew what it was about. The page could be a bit too messy. The only clean spot you eye is attracted to is the ‘Tools’ box, of which you really have no use if you’re a first-time visitor.

    Similarly, navigation is a bit cumbersome, and they’re not using their database as much as they could. I couldn’t figure out a way to order stories according to the criteria reviews are based upon. Could be helpful for watchdogs (such as the sponsoring sunshine foundation) to look through the most biased articles, or for Jschools to look at the most well-written ones.

  • 3. Reviews of the latest jou&hellip  |  February 18th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

    […] says Alex Gamela, is “A sort of Michelin guide for news […]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« May    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Most Recent Posts